That is a good whack of feedback. Thanks gang.
Nate: I think they all do, now. This one is pre-now and has no bosses (as sbear confirms). I’m running offset now, my current wheels are offset and in good shape: I’d probably just stick with that. I was just testing the waters since both forks are available offset and symmetrical. I was looking to see if someone might chime in with an “I run a symmetrical fork now, and it’s a chick magnet” or some other compelling argument that would justify the switch.
Among my apprehension with rivnuts: I read a lengthy article some time ago relating to rivnuts and stress in aluminum (which has, of course, nothing to do with a Pugsley fork). The only REAL concern with them is that for a rivnut with an M4 thread you have to drill a substantially bigger hole (multiplied by however many I chose to throw in there), in a fork, that takes a beating under the best of circumstances. Since I’m a bigger guy and I tend to put a whack down on components, I just put rivnuts out of my mind. Not saying that I’m some sort of rivnut or stress expert, just sort of wondering if that might be a concern? The tools- I have access to at work. So that’s not a thing.
What manner of designs jhenry (I mean, if it doesn’t violate any NDA or anything like that)? Things similar to the stresses associated with a great big guy, with no skilz or finesse, throwing a whack down on a bicycle fork? I’d be willing to bet there is a chance you might know more about this than me? You and everyone else that chimed in.
Honestly; thanks everyone. I appreciate all of your input.