Pros of being legit:
- Money from CORP budget for tools and annual maintenance.
- Better organization/communication through CORP channels.
- Some assurance that the trails will be around and continue to be maintained.
- Potential ability to do larger, funded projects.
- Trail listed on CORP page with conditions, so more wheels, hopefully more volunteers. The East Side is definitely a trail desert, and a surprising number of people don't know about the Burdocks; just getting them on the web page would increase awareness quite a bit.
Cons of being legit:
- It's possible that the land manager/owner doesn't want trails there and doesn't know they are there, and it ends up being a sleeping dog we shouldn't have woken (this is pretty unlikely; it's hard to believe they don't know, and we have a good track record of working with land managers and crafting agreements that work for both parties).
- Land manager and/or their lawyers may have issues with and/or ideas about what trails should look like.
- For it to really work better than it does now, someone will have to be in charge; of trail conditions, of interacting with the land manager, of dealing with other users and sometimes telling people what they can and can't do. That all takes more time and commitment than just showing up when you have some free time.
- Some of the cool, organic, hobo vibe goes away. It's actually pretty easy to keep most of this, but for some people, especially who have been using and caring for the trails for a long time, this may be a sticking point. We will get accused of trying to "take over" the trails if we move ahead.
We went through this a few years ago at Quarry Park, and I think most will agree that it has worked out for the best. Instead of cycles of a couple years of decent maintenance followed by a couple years of neglect, then a bunch of work to try to bring it back, it's consistently in great shape, a lot more people are riding there, we've got a really good relationship with the City and with the other users of the park, and it still has a pretty unique feel.
As far as an "Other Trails" section of the website, that's a tough call. Drawing more attention and riders to trails that aren't supposed to be there isn't necessarily in the best interest of the trail. Whether the land manager doesn't know they are there, or does and is choosing to look the other way, keeping it on the down-low is often the best approach. On the other hand, we don't get a ton of traffic outside the mountain bike community, so that may not be much of a risk.
Bottom line for me is, it would be good for the trails, good for the riders currently using them, and good for the local community to bring the trails above board, but it will require someone, or hopefully a few people, to put in a little time, first going to meetings and emailing and such, and then organizing work sessions and maintaining the relationship with the landowner. It's not as glamorous as trimming weeds and digging in the dirt, but it's worth it to see the trails in better shape and more people riding them.
Thank you augs.
I suppose another pro is that much needed signs could be put up to urge a direction of travel.
Today I almost collided twice with the same MTBer who seemed to have a "Devil may care" attitude of riding in whatever direction on whatever trail he felt like at the moment while I was riding in what I believe is the direction of travel that makes the most sense.
Signs may upset these kinds of "Whatever" riders but safety should be above that.
As you point out with them being sorta secret is an appeal. I hesitated sharing them on here for as long as I could until I couldn't tolerate the neglect of basic maintenance any longer or where there were needs that would have, IMO, required power tools to deal with it.
For me I like the Burdocks because they are the closest ones where I can actually ride my MTB to them as opposed to driving a Death Monster to other trails that are farther away even though driving gets me to better trails.
The Burds has a couple of turns that are, IMO, just really sharp and tight and there are two places where it goes really tight to maneuver between trees. I get it that someone is trying to make these natural obstacles fun but I don't think it was very well planned.
If they were official then perhaps those tight turns could be improved for a better flow.
Until that can be dealt with, if ever, in the meantime it could use another trimming and there is a fallen branch that now blocks part of one of the smaller off shoot trails where it would require a chainsaw to make it passable again.
If power tools is frowned upon then one of those really huge two man lumberjack saws or an ax would suffice.
And then there is the overgrowth of "weeds" that could use a really good trimming in a lot of areas.
If anyone wants to help let me know right here and what tools you have and can bring.
I plan to be there on Sat. Sept 12th. at 1pm.
If you cannot be there let me know and we will coordinate it so we can work on this together.
If I do not get any response to help then I will have to get a weed trimmer and other tools and go at it myself.
I know there is some objection to using power tools but if I am alone then I will feel that I don't have much of a choice at taming this jungle.
Since I have a lot of free time I'd be willing to do what it takes to turn these trails into official ones.
Where and how do I start?